Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(statedb_cmd): Add deep check functionality to UTXO:Ords map index #2088

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024

Conversation

popcnt1
Copy link
Collaborator

@popcnt1 popcnt1 commented Jul 6, 2024

Summary

The UTXO:Ords map index function now features an option for a 'deep check'. This thorough validation confirms whether the provided UtXO:Ords map database and the ones stored in the table match. If not, it raises a panic error. The print statement has also been modified to include the start time of the indexing process.

…index

The UTXO:Ords map index function now features an option for a 'deep check'. This thorough validation confirms whether the provided UtXO:Ords map database and the ones stored in the table match. If not, it raises a panic error. The print statement has also been modified to include the start time of the indexing process.
@popcnt1 popcnt1 requested review from wow-sven and pause125 as code owners July 6, 2024 17:34
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 6, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rooch-portal ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 6, 2024 5:36pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rooch ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jul 6, 2024 5:36pm

@popcnt1 popcnt1 merged commit bfe76e3 into rooch-network:main Jul 6, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
@popcnt1 popcnt1 deleted the feat.ord_index_check branch July 6, 2024 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant